The Quiet Saboteurs
Updated: Sep 17

There is a peculiar heartache that comes with leaving a country during political instability. The borders, paperwork, logistics, and difficulties of beginning again are expected. What I did not anticipate was how much departure would change the relationships around me. Leaving is rarely received as a neutral decision. People assign meaning to it, sometimes because they disagree with your reasons, sometimes because they are frightened for you, and sometimes simply because your leaving means losing you.
What I also didn’t anticipate was that this would cut in both directions. Some people disappeared or became strangely distant, while others showed up in ways that surprised me completely. I could not always predict which would be which. There are easier ways to learn about the relationships in your life, but few are quite as clarifying as doing something difficult that the people around you may not entirely understand.
The Mirror
When you decide to leave, you are making a decision about your own life, but it inevitably touches the lives and choices of other people. For someone who has considered leaving and decided against it, someone who cannot leave, or someone deeply invested in staying, your departure may raise questions you never intended to ask. What does it mean that you’re going and I’m staying? Does your decision say something about mine? Are you seeing something I don’t see, or simply seeing the same thing differently?
People respond to those questions in different ways. Sometimes leaving is interpreted as fear, which can make staying look like courage. Sometimes departure is heard as criticism of the people who remain, even when no criticism was intended. I began to understand how easily “I don’t believe I can stay here” could be heard as “I don’t understand how you can.” Those are not the same statement, but in an emotionally and politically charged moment, the distinction can disappear quickly.
I am reluctant to pretend I know exactly what was happening inside someone else’s mind. Some people were expressing genuine concern. Some disagreed with our assessment of what was happening in America. Some were grieving, and some may have felt abandoned. What mattered to me, particularly in the middle of leaving, was ultimately less about determining the motive than noticing what happened to the relationship.
Actions Are Louder Than Words
Some people framed leaving as a question of loyalty. I encountered the idea that staying was the more courageous or morally responsible choice, particularly during a period of political upheaval. I could understand the argument without accepting it for my own life. What troubled me was the assumption that solidarity required us to accept someone else’s calculation of what risks we should tolerate, what sacrifices we owed, and how long we were obligated to remain somewhere that no longer felt sustainable to us.
Other responses were quieter. Support that had once felt mutual became less reliable, and people I thought would naturally be part of such a major transition sometimes became strangely absent from it. There was no confrontation to point to and often nothing dramatic enough to name. There was simply absence, and at that particular moment absence carried more weight than it might have at another time.
A close friendship quietly faded for me this way during the moving process. There was no argument or final rupture, only absence in a moment that needed presence. On the day I left there was a small gesture of warmth and the familiar promises about keeping in touch, which I appreciated. But neither of us seemed particularly surprised when contact never really resumed. I don’t know exactly why the friendship ended, and with distance I feel less need to assign a single explanation to it. I only know that something changed during that transition and never changed back.
Perhaps the most complicated response came from people who genuinely loved us and were genuinely there for us, but who also did not want us to go. Someone could help us prepare to leave while hoping we would change our minds, or support us while wishing circumstances would eventually bring us back. I don’t think there is anything sinister about that contradiction. Love is not always tidy or entirely selfless. Still, it could be difficult to hold deep gratitude for someone’s presence while knowing that the future I was working so hard to reach was not necessarily the future they wanted for me.
Grappling in the Moment
The timing made all of this harder because it arrived precisely when I had the least capacity to sort through it. We were managing bureaucracy, renovations, packing, selling, closing accounts, saying goodbye, and dismantling the practical structure of one life before we had any assurance that the next one would work. Even when leaving is voluntary, there is something strange about deliberately taking apart a life you once worked very hard to create. At exactly the moment I needed familiar relationships most, some of those relationships were changing too.
During the move, I missed a stair and badly sprained my ankle. I was already running on diminished reserves, so the injury slowed everything down at the worst possible moment. What happened afterward surprised me. Some people stepped forward far more than I expected, while others whose presence I had assumed I could count on were nowhere. The absence hurt, but the unexpected kindness mattered just as much. There is something deeply moving about discovering that someone you had not thought of as part of your inner circle is willing to carry a box, bring food, solve a problem, or simply notice that you are struggling. I remember who wasn’t there, but I also remember, perhaps more vividly, the people who were.
The Reckoning
With some distance, I am less interested in deciding exactly why everyone behaved as they did. Leaving was not happening only to us. Our decision affected people who loved us, worried about us, disagreed with us, or simply expected us to remain part of the landscape of their lives. They were entitled to have feelings about that, including feelings I didn’t like. Some of what felt like resistance may have been grief, some may have been fear or genuine disagreement, and some may have reflected relationships that were already more fragile than I understood.
What they were not entitled to was control over the decision itself, and that distinction has become important to me. Someone can believe I am making a terrible mistake and still respect that the mistake, if it is one, is mine to make. They can be hurt that I am leaving and still help me carry the boxes. They can hope I eventually come home without needing the life I am building elsewhere to fail. And I can extend compassion toward someone’s response without pretending it didn’t hurt or ignoring what their actions taught me about the relationship.
Major transitions reveal capacities that ordinary life does not always test. Some relationships could tolerate disagreement, distance, fear, and grief without withdrawing love or respect. Some could not. Others surprised me entirely. The move did not simply reveal who wouldn’t show up. It revealed who would, including people I had underestimated or simply had not realized were paying attention.
I think that is all we can really do with the information these moments give us. We can grieve what changed, be grateful for what held, allow people their complicated feelings, and continue making the choices that belong to us. We don’t need to turn every disappointment into a judgment of someone’s character, but neither do we have to ignore what their actions teach us about a relationship. Sometimes leaving a place changes who comes with you, not across the border necessarily, but into whatever comes next.
Further reading
Festinger, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957.
Tesser, Abraham. "Toward a Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model of Social Behavior." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 21 (1988): 181–227.
Hirschman, Albert O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.
Baumeister, Roy F., and Mark R. Leary. "The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation." Psychological Bulletin 117, no. 3 (1995): 497–529.
Portes, Alejandro, and Rubén G. Rumbaut. Immigrant America: A Portrait. 4th ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014.
Bhugra, Dinesh. "Migration and Mental Health." Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 109, no. 4 (2004): 243–258.




Comments